Cognition - Juggling, Startups, Life. - Latest Comments in Why Microsoft is Evil (and Google is Not)

Re: Why Microsoft is Evil (and Google is Not)

Guest — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 17:10:43 -0000

I got your point, well services always comes with a price and good services always get high price..

Re: Why Microsoft is Evil (and Google is Not)

Financial Advisor Rochester — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 17:10:41 -0000

I got your point, well services always comes with a price and good services always get high price..

Re: Why Microsoft is Evil (and Google is Not)

topaz — Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:12:20 -0000

they won't think of your suggestion LOL, they are always looking for their self profits..

Re: Why Microsoft is Evil (and Google is Not)

Nail Arts Designer — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 04:02:05 -0000

Great post.. this is really a great information..This will be useful post.. I will comeback for more..

Cheers,
sain-web.com

Re: Why Microsoft is Evil (and Google is Not)

real estate marketing — Mon, 17 Aug 2009 03:22:41 -0000

I agree.. I think they are both useful to us..

Re: Why Microsoft is Evil (and Google is Not)

Alien talk — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:52:33 -0000

Interesting Article ! But I Think Both Are Useful.

Re: Why Microsoft is Evil (and Google is Not)

closing cost — Wed, 13 May 2009 05:59:21 -0000

Its is good difference between microsoft and google..Everyone knows about microsoft and what are they doing..

Re: Why Microsoft is Evil (and Google is Not)

admin — Sat, 14 Feb 2009 23:35:04 -0000

Doug - Both are true, I think. But there's a difference between social efficiency and business efficiency. Government handouts and deferred taxes are efficient for business, but socially inefficient.

Why not simply give the same money to the CONSUMERS - as an incentive to buy the cars that Ford and GM now promise to make fuel-efficient?

Re: Why Microsoft is Evil (and Google is Not)

Doug Ransom — Sat, 14 Feb 2009 09:53:52 -0000

"in a world so backwards we’re giving money away to the producers of the most inefficient vehicles on the planet"

could read

"in a world so backwards we’re giving money away to the most inefficient producers of vehicles on the planet ... "